8 WPX Alternatives and Competitors

WPX is a fast managed WordPress hosting provider known for its speed-focused infrastructure and hands-on WordPress support. WPX plans start from $20.83/mo. It uses LiteSpeed Servers with LiteSpeed Cache and OpCache, along with its proprietary XDN (eXceptional Delivery Network) to deliver fast, global performance for WordPress and WooCommerce sites. However, WPX has its limitations. It supports only WordPress and WooCommerce, lacks a built-in website builder, and doesn’t include email hosting or a domain on entry-level plans.

Alternatives to WPX refer to direct competitors that outperform it in areas such as pricing, speed, WordPress site limits, and data center availability in key regions. When choosing the best WPX alternatives, look for lower introductory pricing, faster infrastructure, support for additional WordPress websites, and broader server coverage across Europe and Oceania.

Hostinger, TMDHosting, and Kinsta are the best alternatives to WPX. Hostinger starts at $2.99/month and supports up to 100 WordPress sites with 100 GB NVMe storage. TMDHosting starts at $2.99/month and includes stack-specific hosting, cPanel, and daily backups. Kinsta starts at $24/month and offers edge caching, autoscaling, and 35 global data center options powered by Google Cloud.

1. Hostinger

https://www.hostinger.com

Hostinger is a budget-friendly WPX alternative that’s better suited for users who want to host multiple WordPress sites without breaking the bank. Hostinger’s Premium WordPress plan costs just $2.99/month and supports up to 100 websites, whereas WPX’s Business plan starts at $20.83/month for 5 websites. Hostinger also gives you 100 GB of NVMe storage, email hosting, and a free domain (none of which are included in WPX’s entry tier).

Both platforms use LiteSpeed servers with built-in caching, but Hostinger goes further by offering AI tools, a beginner-friendly website builder, and staging environments even on lower tiers. WPX includes malware removal and a custom-built CDN (XDN), but Hostinger bundles more automation and DIY tools for non-technical users.

Hostinger easily beats WPX when it comes to global reach. It runs 10 data centers across the US, UK, Netherlands, India, Brazil, and Southeast Asia. WPX only has 3 (Chicago, London, and Sydney). Hostinger is a smart pick if you want affordable, scalable WordPress hosting with better regional performance options. Compare Hostinger and WPX directly in our writeup on WPX vs Hostinger.

2. TMDHosting

https://www.tmdhosting.com

TMDHosting is a flexible WPX alternative that’s better suited for users who want stack-specific hosting and more backend control. TMDHosting’s Starter WordPress plan starts at just $2.99/month and includes 50 GB of SSD storage, unlimited email accounts, and a free domain. In contrast, WPX’s Business plan starts at $20.83/month with only 15 GB of storage, limited email functionality, and no domain.

Both hosts are optimized for WordPress, but TMDHosting includes cPanel, Softaculous, and daily backups even on its lowest tier. This makes it more familiar for users who prefer traditional control panels. On the other hand, WPX uses a custom dashboard with less flexibility and reserves some features (e.g. on-demand backups) for higher-tier plans.

TMDHosting also offers better global coverage than WPX. It operates data centers in the US, UK, Netherlands, Singapore, Japan, and Australia. WPX limits users to just 3 locations: Chicago, London, and Sydney. TMDHosting is a stronger option than WPX if you need broader server location choices and a more configurable hosting stack. Read our full TMDHosting review for more details.

3. Kinsta

https://kinsta.com

Kinsta is a premium WPX alternative better suited for users who need enterprise-level WordPress hosting with more technical depth. Kinsta’s WordPress plans start at $35 per month and run on the Google Cloud Platform’s premium tier, and uses isolated containers for each site. WPX also uses high-performance infrastructure, but it does not offer containerization or the same level of resource isolation.

Both providers focus on speed and reliability, but Kinsta includes more advanced developer tools. These include SSH access, Git integration, and automated performance monitoring. WPX focuses more on support-led optimization with malware scanning and a custom-built CDN. Kinsta works well for developers and agencies who prefer to manage their own stack, while WPX suits users who want a hands-off experience.Kinsta also offers broader global reach than WPX. It provides access to 35 data center locations across North America, Europe, Asia, and Oceania. WPX limits users to 3 fixed locations in Chicago, London, and Sydney. Kinsta is a better choice for users who want flexible deployment options and reliable performance close to their target audience. Compare Kinsta and WPX directly in our writeup on WPX vs Kinsta.

4. Cloudways

https://www.cloudways.com

Cloudways is a flexible WPX alternative ideal for users who want full control over their hosting environment. Cloudways pricing begins at $11 per month, and users are able to choose between multiple cloud providers, including DigitalOcean, AWS, and Google Cloud. WPX only offers fixed plans on its own infrastructure, without the ability to customize server specifications.

Both hosts support managed WordPress hosting, but Cloudways offers more performance tools. These include object caching with Redis and Memcached, staging environments, and server-level configuration settings. WPX provides solid performance through LiteSpeed and its XDN CDN, but relies more on support to handle technical tasks. Cloudways gives users the tools to manage performance directly.

Cloudways also offers significantly more server location options than WPX. Users are able to choose from over 65 data center locations through its provider network. WPX limits hosting to three locations in Chicago, London, and Sydney. Cloudways is a better fit for developers or businesses that need scalable hosting and control over geographic distribution. Compare Cloudways and WPX directly in our writeup on WPX vs Cloudways.

5. Nexcess

https://www.nexcess.net/

Nexcess is a versatile WPX alternative that’s better suited for users running content-heavy or multi-platform websites. Nexcess supports WordPress, WooCommerce, and Magento, while WPX focuses only on WordPress and WooCommerce. Nexcess plans start at $18.60 per month and include autoscaling, daily backups, and visual staging environments. WPX does not support autoscaling and reserves on-demand backups for higher-tier users.

Both hosts optimize for performance, but Nexcess includes deeper technical tools. These include a proprietary performance monitoring plugin, plugin update tracking, and premium plugin access. WPX relies on its custom CDN and speed optimization through support requests. Nexcess offers more self-serve performance options, while WPX emphasizes fast support and hands-on fixes.

Nexcess also runs more data centers than WPX. It operates 10 facilities in the US, UK, Netherlands, and Australia, and includes access to a global edge CDN with 285 points of presence. WPX operates three locations and lacks the same edge reach. Nexcess is a smarter option if you manage large or dynamic websites and need more performance visibility.

6. WP Engine

https://wpengine.com

WP Engine is a high-end WPX alternative built for developers and agencies managing large site portfolios. WP Engine Plans start at $20 per month and include staging, production, and development environments for each site. WPX also supports staging, but lacks separate deployment environments and developer tools like Git integration and SSH access.

Both services prioritize WordPress performance, but WP Engine offers more built-in optimization. It uses EverCache, Cloudflare Enterprise CDN, and smart caching layers for faster load times. WPX uses LiteSpeed and its XDN CDN, but does not offer the same caching depth or enterprise-grade protection. WP Engine also includes automatic plugin updates and strong DDoS mitigation.

WP Engine provides more global infrastructure than WPX. It offers over 20 data center locations through Google Cloud, and lets users choose servers closer to their audience. WPX limits hosting to 3 fixed locations and does not offer location flexibility. WP Engine is a better fit for teams managing complex WordPress projects that require scalability and deployment control. Read our full WP Engine review for more details.

7. SiteGround

https://www.siteground.com

SiteGround is a capable WPX alternative that’s better suited for users who want broader hosting support and stronger infrastructure. SiteGround offers shared, cloud, and reseller hosting, while WPX is limited to managed WordPress and WooCommerce plans. SiteGround’s StartUp plan starts at $2.99 per month and includes daily backups, free email, and a bundled site builder. WPX’s Business plan starts at $20.83 per month and lacks a builder or email hosting.

Both SiteGround and WPX are optimized for WordPress, but SiteGround provides more advanced management tools. These include SuperCacher for dynamic content caching, Git integration, and a WordPress auto-updater. WPX supports malware removal and a custom CDN, but lacks version control and developer tools. SiteGround also uses Google Cloud infrastructure, which delivers strong uptime and fast response times.

SiteGround operates more data centers than WPX. Users are able to choose from 11 facilities in the US, UK, Netherlands, Germany, France, Spain, Singapore, and Australia. WPX only offers 3 locations. SiteGround is a better choice if you need global hosting coverage and tools that support non-WordPress projects. Compare SiteGround and WPX directly in our writeup on WPX vs SiteGround.

8. Bluehost

https://www.bluehost.com/

Bluehost is a beginner-friendly WPX alternative that’s better suited for users who want guided WordPress setup and strong platform integration. Bluehost’s Basic plan starts at $2.95 per month. It includes 10 GB of SSD storage, a free domain, bundled email, and official WordPress.org endorsement. WPX starts at a much higher price point and excludes domain registration and email hosting from its entry tier.

Both providers support WordPress, but Bluehost offers a more structured onboarding experience. New users are guided through installation, plugin setup, and design selection via a custom control panel layered over cPanel. WPX also provides 1-click installs, but relies on support-driven setup rather than automation.

Bluehost operates from a single US-based data center, while WPX has 3 global locations in Chicago, London, and Sydney. WPX therefore offers better global coverage. Bluehost remains a reliable option for US-based users who want a more basic WordPress experience. Read our full Bluehost review for more details.

Who Are the WPX Alternatives for Different Hosting Needs?

WPX’s alternatives include Hostinger, TMDHosting, Kinsta, Cloudways, Nexcess, WP Engine, SiteGround, and Bluehost. Each provider delivers better value than WPX across specific use cases such as lower pricing, stronger performance features, more generous site limits, or wider data center availability. Here’s how they compare:

Which WordPress Hosts Are More Affordable Than WPX?

These WordPress hosts are more affordable than WPX:

Which WordPress Hosts Are Faster Than WPX?

These WordPress hosts are faster than WPX:

Which WordPress Hosts Allow More Hosted WordPress Sites Than WPX?

These WordPress hosts allow more hosted WordPress sites than WPX:

What Are the WPX Alternatives With UK Data Centers?

These WPX alternatives have data centers in the UK:

What Are the WPX Alternatives With Australia Data Centers?

These WPX alternatives have data centers in Australia: