9 Kinsta Alternatives And Competitors

Kinsta offers premium managed WordPress hosting built on the Google Cloud Platform with Edge Caching for speed and security. It appeals to developers and businesses who need a high-performance WordPress setup with automatic scaling and daily backups. However, Kinsta is expensive with a starting price of $30/mo. It also restricts users with low PHP worker counts and limits on hosted sites. 

Alternatives to Kinsta refer to direct competitors that outperform it in areas such as affordability, PHP worker allocation, hosted site capacity, and server flexibility. When choosing the best Kinsta alternatives, look for lower introductory pricing, more hosted sites, higher PHP worker quotas, and advanced caching technologies.

Hostinger, TMDHosting, and Cloudways are the best alternatives to Kinsta. Hostinger starts at $2.99/mo and includes LiteSpeed caching and support for up to 25 WordPress sites. TMDHosting starts at $9.52/mo and provides daily backups and stack-specific hosting. Cloudways starts at $11/mo and delivers a developer-focused cloud platform with vertical scaling and flexible billing.

1. Hostinger

https://www.hostinger.com

Hostinger is a low-cost alternative to Kinsta that targets beginners and small businesses. It is based in Lithuania and focuses on accessible, high-speed hosting using a simplified dashboard and LiteSpeed technology.

Hostinger’s managed WordPress plans are significantly cheaper than Kinsta’s and provide 1-click WordPress installation and automatic updates. However, Hostinger’s entry level plan supports up to 25 sites, while Kinsta only allows one site on its entry plan. Hostinger also includes a free domain and email, which Kinsta does not provide. However, Kinsta excels with daily backups while Hostinger only provides weekly backups. 

In terms of performance, Hostinger uses SSD storage and LiteSpeed Web Server across all plans. Kinsta leverages the premium tier of the Google Cloud Platform and provides edge caching and a Content Delivery Network. Hostinger is more than sufficient for low to mid-traffic WordPress sites but Kinsta delivers better performance at scale.

Hostinger provides 10 data centers across 4 continents, including India and Brazil. This is far fewer than Kinsta’s 35 data center locations. Compare Kinsta and Hostinger directly in our writeup on Kinsta vs Hostinger.

2. TMDHosting

https://www.tmdhosting.com

TMDHosting is a web host based in the United States. It offers flexible managed WordPress hosting with stack-specific configurations. It is a more affordable and customizable alternative to Kinsta for users who want cPanel and greater deployment control.

TMDHosting supports unlimited WordPress sites on most shared plans and includes features like daily backups, Softaculous auto-installer, and staging environments. Kinsta limits users to one site and does not offer cPanel access. Both hosts offer fully managed services, WordPress-optimized servers and 1-click WordPress installation. TMDHosting’s managed services also extend to its VPS (Virtual Private Server) and dedicated server plans.

Unlike Kinsta, which runs on Google Cloud and edge caching, TMDHosting uses Apache servers with SSD storage and optional NGINX. TMDHosting offers less advanced caching but more backend flexibility, making it better for users who need full-stack access.

TMDHosting runs 6 data centers in the US, UK, Netherlands, Singapore, Japan, and Australia. While this offers TMDHosting customers excellent options, Kinsta offers a wider geographic spread. Read our full TMDHosting review for more details.

3. Cloudways

https://www.cloudways.com

Cloudways is a developer-friendly cloud hosting provider that offers a flexible alternative to Kinsta. It allows users to host their WordPress site on third-party cloud infrastructure like DigitalOcean, AWS, and Google Cloud. It also provides full staging, Git, and cloning tools. Unlike Kinsta, Cloudways does not restrict you to one plan or stack. This lets you host multiple sites and scale server resources vertically. 

Optimization features on Cloudways include Breeze caching, built-in CDN integration, and optional Redis. These tools mirror Kinsta’s edge caching and CDN in function. However, Cloudways allows deeper customization. Kinsta excels in WordPress-specific technical expertise. 

Cloudways offers over 65 global data center locations via its providers. Its server coverage is nearly twice as large as Kinsta’s, giving customers greater choice to host from a suitable location. Compare Kinsta and Cloudways directly in our writeup on Kinsta vs Cloudways.

4. Nexcess

https://www.nexcess.net/

Nexcess is a US-based managed WordPress hosting provider backed by Liquid Web. It serves as a scalable, performance-driven alternative to Kinsta for users with growing content needs.

Nexcess offers managed WordPress with daily backups, built-in CDN, auto-scaling, and plugin updates. Unlike Kinsta, Nexcess includes more PHP workers and supports multiple WordPress installs on its entry-level Spark plan. Kinsta limits these aggressively, which may affect dynamic site performance.

In terms of optimization, Nexcess includes advanced features like image compression, lazy loading, and staging by default. Kinsta provides similar tools but charges more for expanded resources and development features. Nexcess gives better baseline value for resource-intensive WordPress installs.

Nexcess offers a total of 10 data centers. It offers excellent data center coverage in different parts of the US, and also has a data center in London, UK. However, it lacks presence in Asia and Oceania.

5. WP Engine

https://wpengine.com

WP Engine is a direct Kinsta alternative for managed WordPress hosting. WP Engine offers a lower entry price but includes lower resource allocations than Kinsta.

Both WP Engine and Kinsta utilize Google Cloud infrastructure for reliable performance. However, Kinsta leverages the premium tier of Google Cloud, giving it an edge. Both hosts offer customer support teams of WordPress experts. Both include built-in CDN and caching. WP Engine incorporates EverCache technology, while Kinsta provides Kinsta’s Edge Caching, WP Engine also provides multi-environment staging and deeper developer tools, including Git integration and SSH access. WP Engine supports 10 data centers across 4 continents. This makes it less global than Kinsta’s 35 data centers across 5 continents. Compare Kinsta and WP Engine directly in our article on Kinsta vs WP Engine.

6. WPX

https://wpx.net

WPX, based in Bulgaria, is a performance-optimized WordPress host that rivals Kinsta on speed and simplicity. It focuses on high-speed hosting for users with small site portfolios.

WPX offers a cheaper starting plan than Kinsta and supports 5 WordPress sites by default. Kinsta supports only 1 site on its entry tier. WPX also includes unlimited email hosting and free manual migrations. Kinsta does not offer either. WPX optimizes WordPress hosting through its LiteSpeed Web Server, custom CDN (XDN), and aggressive full-page caching. However, WPX lacks access to DevKinsta, Git, WP-CLI, and SSH. Kinsta includes all of these, giving developers more tools for workflow and diagnostics.WPX operates 3 data centers located in the US, UK, and Australia which are far outnumbered by Kinsta’s 35 data centers. However, latency remains low due to WPX’s custom CDN. WPX is ideal for users needing lower-cost managed WordPress hosting and targeting select regions. Compare Kinsta and WPX directly in our article on Kinsta vs WPX.

7. SiteGround

https://www.siteground.com

SiteGround is a premium WordPress host headquartered in Bulgaria. It competes with Kinsta through automation, support, and caching.

SiteGround offers managed WordPress plans with automated updates, plugin management, daily backups and 1-click WordPress installations. Unlike Kinsta, SiteGround also includes email hosting and Git tools. It also supports multiple sites at lower tiers, giving it an edge for multi-site users. Optimization tools include SuperCacher, dynamic caching, and Ultrafast PHP. These features deliver speeds that rival Kinsta’s edge caching and container setup. 

SiteGround operates 11 data centers in the US, UK, Germany, Netherlands, Singapore, and Australia. Compare Kinsta and SiteGround directly in our writeup on Kinsta vs SiteGround.

8. DreamHost

https://www.dreamhost.com

DreamHost is a long-established web host based in the United States. It offers a budget-friendly managed WordPress plan known as DreamPress, making it a low-cost alternative to Kinsta.

DreamPress supports one WordPress site on the base plan, similar to Kinsta. However, DreamHost includes email hosting and unmetered bandwidth, while Kinsta excludes email and sets fixed visitor limits. DreamPress is better for users who need a full-service hosting setup under one plan. Optimization on DreamPress includes server-side caching, on-demand backups, and SSD storage. These tools are simpler than Kinsta’s containerized environment and edge caching but sufficient for moderate traffic. Kinsta still leads in performance for enterprise-grade setups, but DreamPress is a better fit for simpler blogs and business sites.

DreamHost only operates data centers in the US. This drastically limits global performance and makes it best suited for WordPress sites targeting the Americas. Read our full DreamHost review for more details.

9. Bluehost

https://www.bluehost.com/

Bluehost is a US-based hosting provider officially recommended by WordPress.org. It is a beginner-friendly alternative to Kinsta, with a focus on ease of use and guided onboarding.

Unlike Kinsta, Bluehost includes a custom dashboard layered over cPanel, making site management intuitive for first-time users. Bluehost plans support multiple WordPress installs, and offer unmetered bandwidth and free domain registration. Kinsta limits site installs on entry plans and provides no domain registration. Optimization tools in Bluehost include standard caching and SSD storage. It does not match Kinsta’s performance, which relies on Google Cloud and container isolation, but Bluehost is easier to navigate. It suits new site owners who want simplicity now and scalability later.

Bluehost operates a single data center in the US. Bluehost remains a practical option for users targeting US traffic and needing an affordable, well-supported start with WordPress. Compare Kinsta and Bluehost directly in our article on Kinsta vs Bluehost.

Who Are the Kinsta Alternatives for Different Hosting Needs?

Kinsta alternatives for different hosting needs include Hostinger, SiteGround, WPX, TMDHosting, Nexcess, WP Engine, DreamHost, Bluehost, and Cloudways. Each of these hosts outperforms Kinsta in specific areas like PHP worker limits, hosted site quotas, caching, or enterprise tools.

Which Managed WordPress Hosts Are Faster Than Kinsta?

These managed WordPress hosts offer fast performance and caching setups that outperform or are comparable to Kinsta.

Which Managed WordPress Hosts Offer More PHP Workers Than Kinsta?

PHP workers refer to the number of simultaneous PHP processes a host’s server is able to handle. These WordPress hosts provide more PHP workers than Kinsta in their cheapest WordPress hosting plans:

Which Managed WordPress Hosts Allow More Hosted WordPress Sites Than Kinsta?

These web hosts let you host more WordPress sites on their entry-level plans than Kinsta.

What Are the Kinsta Alternatives With Enterprise WordPress Hosting?

These hosts offer enterprise-level managed WordPress solutions comparable to or exceeding Kinsta’s enterprise plans.